ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Effect of social support and social network on the risk of hearing aids abandonment among older adults with hearing loss.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHearing aids are the most widely used rehabilitation strategy for age-related hearing loss, yet adherence has historically been low. Public policies that provide hearing aids have been implemented in both developed and developing countries, emphasizing the importance of identifying factors associated with hearing aid abandonment.
objectiveTo determine the effect of generic and specific social support on the risk of early hearing aid abandonment in older adults who benefit from a public policy for hearing aid provision in Chile.
methodsA cohort study was conducted with adults aged 65–85 years who received hearing aids at a public hospital in Chile. A total of 355 patients were randomly selected and, after providing informed consent, were visited at home for the assessment. We assessed specific informational support for hearing aid use, economic support for device maintenance, and general emotional and social support following device fitting. The social network was evaluated in terms of size, closeness, and contact frequency. Time to hearing aid abandonment was analyzed using flexible parametric survival models.
resultsOverall, 21.7% of participants abandoned their hearing aids. Receiving financial assistance was associated with a lower abandonment risk (HR = 0.43; 95%CI: 0.23–0.85; p = 0.014). Scoring above the median on the MOS emotional support subscale also reduced abandonment risk (HR = 0.34; 95%CI: 0.25–0.85; p = 0.013). Household composition (i.e., closeness) and contact frequency both affected device abandonment.
conclusionsEconomic and emotional support, as well as social network closeness and contact frequency, affect early abandonment. Involving close relatives is essential for monitoring hearing aid use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.