ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Multidimensional Evaluation of AI-Generated Patient Information on Cone Beam-Computed Tomography.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to conduct a multidimensional evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot-generated patient information regarding cone beam-computed tomography (CBCT) in dentistry, with specific focus on readability, informational quality, reliability, and patient-centered suitability. Twenty frequently asked, patient-oriented questions related to CBCT were systematically identified from a public online forum. Each question was submitted to four large language model-based chatbots (ChatGPT-4o, Gemini Advanced, Claude Sonnet 4, and Microsoft Copilot) under standardized conditions. Generated responses were evaluated using validated instruments, including the DISCERN tool and Global Quality Scale (GQS) for information quality and reliability, as well as Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, and Gunning Fog Index for readability. Patient-centeredness was further assessed using PEMAT-Understandability and PEMAT-Actionability scores. Comparative analyses were performed using linear mixed-effects models. Significant differences were observed among chatbots across all evaluated domains (p < 0.05). While advanced models demonstrated higher informational quality and reliability, their responses frequently exceeded recommended health literacy thresholds. Readability, transparency, and actionability varied substantially between platforms. No chatbot consistently met all criteria for optimal patient-directed communication. AI chatbots can provide generally accurate information on CBCT; however, variability in readability, reliability, and educational suitability limits their standalone use for patient education. Careful integration with professional oversight is essential to ensure safe and accessible AI-supported communication in dentomaxillofacial radiology. This study provides the first multidimensional, comparative evaluation of leading AI chatbots in delivering patient-oriented information about cone beam-computed tomography. It shows critical gaps between informational accuracy and health literacy suitability. This study reveals the need for professional oversight when using AI for patient education in dentomaxillofacial radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42045764What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.