ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Four MRI-Based Radiomics Models for Diagnosis of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (LIDD) is a leading cause of low back pain, with subtle and variable imaging features that challenge early diagnosis. This study aimed to develop and validate a rigorous MRI-based radiomics ensemble model for disc-level LIDD discrimination, using the patient as the primary sampling unit, with explicit statistical correction for the non-independence of multiple lumbar discs from the same patient. This retrospective single-center study enrolled 122 subjects (102 LIDD patients and 20 healthy controls), contributing a total of 610 lumbar discs. Regions of interest (ROIs) of intervertebral discs were manually segmented on fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (FS-T2WI) sequences, and 1409 Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI)-compliant radiomic features were extracted. To account for within-patient clustering of discs, multi-step feature selection was performed in the patient-level split training set, including Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE), Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction, Spearman correlation-based redundancy removal, and L1-regularized logistic regression. Three base classifiers (logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), radial basis function SVM) and a soft-voting ensemble model were trained with patient-level fivefold group cross-validation to avoid data leakage. Model performance for disc-level LIDD diagnosis was evaluated via AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in an independent patient-level test set, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for model interpretability. A compact, reproducible radiomic signature was derived from the final selected features. All models achieved excellent diagnostic performance in the independent test set: RF (AUC = 0.966, 95% CI: 0.937-0.988), SVM (AUC = 0.974, 95% CI: 0.949-0.992), and LR (AUC = 0.974, 95% CI: 0.949-0.992). The soft-voting ensemble model achieved the best discrimination with an AUC of 0.976 (95% CI: 0.954-0.992), along with balanced sensitivity (88%) and specificity (96%). SHAP analysis identified key intensity- and texture-based radiomic features driving model predictions. The MRI-based radiomics ensemble model, built with rigorous statistical correction for within-patient clustering of discs and patient-level validation, enables accurate and interpretable disc-level LIDD discrimination. This model shows strong promise for assisting the early detection and objective diagnosis of LIDD in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42045763What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.