ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Cardiorenal Outcomes of Dapagliflozin vs. Empagliflozin in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors provide cardiorenal benefits, direct comparisons between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin-the two most commonly used and studied agents in this class-remain limited, particularly in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). In the current study, we aimed to compare the cardiorenal effectiveness and safety of dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and stage 3B-5 CKD. We used the TriNetX network and identified adults with T2D and stage 3B-5 CKD newly initiating dapagliflozin or empagliflozin. Following a target trial emulation framework, we applied 1:1 propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for major adverse kidney events (MAKE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, and adverse events. After matching, 4,361 participants were included per group. The mean age was 67.6-67.9 years and men comprised 45.3-45.9% with a median follow-up duration of 780-790 days. Dapagliflozin users showed comparable HRs for MAKE (1.04; 95% CI: 0.94-1.16), MACE (1.02; 95% CI: 0.95-1.09), all-cause mortality (0.86; 95% CI: 0.74-1.00), and adverse events (1.03; 95% CI: 0.92-1.14). However, the risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) was higher with dapagliflozin (1.28; 95% CI: 1.11-1.48). We concluded that in adults with T2D and advanced CKD, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin demonstrated comparable cardiorenal effectiveness and safety. Dapagliflozin was associated with a modestly higher ESKD risk, but this finding warrants cautious interpretation and further study given the observational design and potential residual confounding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.