ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2026
Sleep quality in pregnant women with lumbopelvic pain: prevalence of clinically significant sleep disturbance and comparison in clinical outcomes between pregnant women with and without clinically significant sleep disturbance.
Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo characterize sleep quality (SQ), determine the prevalence of clinically significant sleep disturbance (CSSD) and poor SQ in pregnant women with lumbopelvic pain (LBPP), compare quality of life (QoL), functionality, anxiety, and depression between those with and without CSSD, and correlate SQ with pain intensity, QoL, disability, anxiety, and depression.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included pregnant women with LBPP, ≥ 20 gestational weeks (GW). Participants completed an electronic form with sociodemographic information and questionnaires to assess QoL (SF-36), functionality (Oswestry Disability Index), SQ (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), and anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Participants were divided into two groups: CSSD (PSQI ≥ 10) and non-CSSD (PSQI < 10).
resultsFifty-six pregnant women with LBPP were included, presenting a median score of 6 [4.5-6] points on the PSQI (i.e., poor SQ). Thirteen (23%) pregnant women with LBPP were classified in the CSSD group (31 ± 3 years, 28 ± 6 GW) and 43 in the non-CSSD group (27 ± 5 years, 28 ± 6 GW). The CSSD group presented greater disability (p = 0.01), higher anxiety (p = 0.002) and depression (p = 0.0004), and lower functional capacity (p = 0.03), general health status (p = 0.03), vitality (p = 0.01), social (p = 0.0008) and emotional (p = 0.01) aspects, and mental health (p = 0.001) compared to the non-CSSD group. Moderate correlations were observed between SQ and disability, anxiety, and depression.
conclusionPregnant women with LBPP exhibited poor SQ, 23% presented CSSD and 71% poor SQ. Those with both LBPP and CSSD showed greater disability, anxiety, and depression, and poorer QoL compared to pregnant women with LBPP but without CSSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.