Trial reportAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Three-Dimensional Laser Scanning-Assisted Prosthetic Breast Augmentation for Breast Asymmetry.
Trial report in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast asymmetry is common among augmentation candidates, yet implant selection often relies on subjective judgment. This study evaluated whether three-dimensional (3D) laser scanning could improve preoperative assessment and postoperative breast symmetry.
methodsIn this prospective randomized controlled study, 40 patients with breast asymmetry undergoing implant-based breast augmentation were randomly assigned to either a 3D laser scanning group or a conventional assessment group. In the 3D group, standardized digital measurements were used to guide implant selection, whereas in the control group implant selection was based on the surgeon's clinical experience and routine preoperative evaluation. Postoperative breast volume difference, projection difference, satisfaction scores, and complications were assessed at 12 months.
resultsThe 3D group showed significantly smaller bilateral breast volume differences (P < 0.05) and projection differences (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was higher in the 3D group (P < 0.05), while complication rates were low and comparable between groups (P > 0.05).
conclusions3D laser scanning provides objective and accurate breast measurements, thereby facilitating optimized implant selection, better postoperative symmetry, and higher satisfaction. It serves as a valuable tool for individualized planning in breast augmentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42045687What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.