ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Growth and safety evaluation in very low birth weight infants receiving an exclusive human milk diet: a phase III randomized control trial in Japan.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adverse Events Following Cow's Milk-Derived Human Milk Fortification: A Nationwide Human Milk Bank Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Exclusive human milk diet terminology in JASMINE trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine safety and efficacy of exclusive human milk diet (EHMD) for very low birth weight (VLBW, <1500 g) infants.
designProspective, controlled, open trial of VLBW infants randomized to EHMD (mother's own milk [MOM]/donor milk [DM] with human milk-based fortifiers) or Standard Diet (MOM/DM with cow milk-based fortifier/formula). Outcomes included superiority of weight gain velocity from birth to 34 weeks gestational age, time to full feeds, and safety.
resultIn total, 147 infants received EHMD (n = 77) or Standard Diet (n = 70). The EHMD group had superior mean weight gain velocity versus the Standard Diet (13.44 vs 11.96 g/kg/day, p = 0.006) and earlier mean time to full feeds (20.0 vs 25.9 days, p = 0.03); adverse events were not significantly different (32.5% vs 21.4%, p = 0.13).
conclusionEHMD is viable for management of VLBW infants, providing improved growth without reduced safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION AND ID: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCT2031210384.
Identifiers
42045666What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.