ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Cost Considerations for Rapid Start Implementation: Analysis from Seven Rapid Start Provider Sites.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation within days of HIV diagnosis, also known as "Rapid Start", improves linkage to care, virologic suppression and retention in care. However, data on the costs of Rapid Start implementation in the United States are limited. We aimed to estimate the costs and cost-effectiveness of Rapid Start among seven geographically diverse Ryan White-funded programs with broad variability in populations served and services offered. Each site estimated the costs of ART initiation services, management, and Rapid Start planning activities in three 12-month periods: pre-, initial, and sustained implementation. We estimated quality-adjusted life years (QALY) saved, incremental costs per-person and incremental cost per QALY saved during implementation. We considered an intervention cost-effective if it cost <$76,399 USD per QALY saved (US per capita GDP, 2021). The number of persons initiating ART increased at most sites during implementation, which, together with assumed shorter times to viral suppression contributed to QALYs saved. Pre-implementation, the per-person cost of ART initiation and Rapid Start planning ranged from $549-$30,626, which declined at most sites during implementation. Incremental costs per-person ranged from a cost savings of -$21,284 up to $23,850 additional costs during the initial year and from $24,303 savings up to $11,774 additional costs during sustained implementation. The cost-effectiveness threshold was met by five sites during initial implementation and by all seven during sustained implementation. In conclusion, we demonstrated that Rapid Start was cost effective across a wide range of clinical settings, further bolstering this model's importance in ending the HIV epidemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.