ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Osborne's ligament: Anatomical study with application to better understanding ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Almost 70 years ago, Osborne described a fibrous band, Osborne’s ligament, stretching between the humeral and ulnar heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris, which forms the cubital tunnel’s roof. Prior to this account, this ligament had received limited attention in the anatomical literature and had been poorly studied. Therefore, the present anatomical study was performed to better elucidate this structure. Methods thirty adult anatomical donors (60 sides) underwent dissection of the medial aspect of the elbow with a focus on Osborne’s ligament. Identified ligaments were documented, classified, and measured. Additionally, histological evaluation of these structures was performed. Results osborne’s ligaments were identified on 49 sides (81.7%). These were classified as absent (type I; 18.3%), wide and thin and more distally located (type II; 51%), narrow and more proximally located (type III: 39%), coexistent with an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle (type IV; 6%), and absent with only anconeus epitrochlearis muscle (type V; 4.1%). When coexistent with anconeus epitrochlearis muscle (6%), the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle was usually located more proximally, although in some cases, it was in the same plane, especially with larger anconeus epitrochlearis muscles. Conclusions based on our findings, the Osborne’s ligament is not a ligament but is usually made up of aponeurosis/tendon over the proximal flexor carpi ulnaris muscle and can coexist with the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle. This structure comes in various forms, illustrating that this term is not specific to a single structure.Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.