ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Offspring long-term infectious morbidity following pregnancies with cervical cerclage.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCervical cerclage is an acceptable procedure in women with cervical insufficiency and is known to be effective in the prevention of preterm delivery. However, limited data exist regarding long-term health outcomes among offspring exposed to cerclage during pregnancy. Since the presence of a foreign body during pregnancy may change the vaginal microbiome, we aimed to study whether a cervical cerclage is associated with long-term infectious morbidity of the offspring. STUDY
designA retrospective population-based cohort study was performed at a tertiary medical center, including all singleton deliveries between the years 1991-2021. Long-term infectious morbidity was compared among offspring after pregnancies with and without cervical cerclage. The diagnoses of infectious morbidities were defined based on ICD-9 codes as recorded in community clinics and hospitalization files. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve was utilized to evaluate the cumulative incidence. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to control for confounders.
resultsOut of 356,356 offspring included in the analysis, 0.4% (n = 1416) were following pregnancies with cervical cerclage. Unadjusted analyses demonstrated no significant difference in total infectious morbidity between the groups (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9-1.1; p = 0.369, Table 1). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in cumulative incidence (log-rank test P-value = 0.19, Fig. 1). In the primary analysis, cerclage was not associated with long-term infectious morbidity. However, in a secondary model, after adjustment for confounders including gestational age, obesity and diabetes, cerclage exposure was associated with a modest reduction in the risk of long-term infectious morbidity (adjusted HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.87-0.99, p = 0.036).
conclusionIn this large population-based cohort, cervical cerclage was not associated with increased long-term infectious morbidity in offspring. A modest association with reduced infectious morbidity was observed after adjustment for confounding factors. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the observational design and potential residual confounding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.