SynthesisPsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Effect of episodic specificity induction on divergent thinking: A meta-analytic study.
Synthesis in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research suggests that Episodic Specificity Induction (ESI) (i.e., a brief training in episodic recall) can enhance performance in divergent thinking tasks. Based on the constructive episodic simulation hypothesis, participants need to access their past memories and use this information to generate novel ideas in divergent thinking tasks. While some studies report a strong positive effect of ESI on divergent thinking performance, recent evidence challenges this claim. The present meta-analysis examined the impact of the ESI procedure on divergent thinking performance across 21 samples from 16 experiments (reported in ten eligible studies). Results indicated a small increase in fluency (number of ideas), flexibility (categories of ideas), appropriate ideas and categories of appropriate ideas following ESI, compared to control conditions, that became weaker or null after correction for publication bias. Conversely, no significant effect of ESI was found on qualitative dimensions of divergent thinking tasks (e.g., originality, subjective creativity, and elaboration). Assessments of publication bias produced mixed results, generally indicating that studies with null findings may be under-represented in the literature. Given the small effect size and potential publication bias, further research is needed to clarify which components of ESI play a critical role in enhancing divergent thinking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42045627What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.