ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Markerless inside-out tool tracking for endoscopic spine surgery: a benchmarking study and clinical dataset.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiation-free real-time registration update for image-guided multilevel open posterior lumbar fusion: in vivo validation.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMarkerless inside-out surgical instrument tracking using a tool-mounted camera offers a promising solution to the limited clinical adoption of the existing navigation systems, which primarily rely on outside-in optical tracking and are constrained by line-of-sight issues. However, its performance in the surgical environment, with its unique challenges, remains largely unexplored. This work benchmarks state-of-the-art inside-out methods, namely, visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (vSLAM) methods. To this end, we collected a first-of-its-kind dataset in spine endoscopy, providing ground-truth tool poses.
methodsWe recorded endoscopic spine surgeries performed on a high-fidelity training model in a real operating room environment, containing synchronized stereo images from tool-mounted cameras, sub-millimetric ground truth pose data from a commercial optical tracking system, and the endoscopic feed. Using this dataset, the instrument tracking accuracy of a selected number of vSLAM algorithms was compared.
resultsThe best performing approach achieved a root mean squared absolute trajectory error of 2.0 mm and 1.47 degrees, reaching accuracies of around 1 mm and 1 degree on selected sequences. However, it shows degraded performance in the presence of challenges such as occlusions and scene-object dynamics.
conclusionsMarkerless inside-out tracking using vSLAM demonstrated high accuracy, indicating potential feasibility for navigated endoscopic spine applications. Our evaluation revealed that current algorithms remain insufficiently robust for routine clinical use. The presented study and dataset establish a foundation for future research toward reliable, real-time inside-out navigation in minimally invasive surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42045598What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.