ReviewLeukemia2026
Blinatumomab in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: current and future use.
Review in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation antibody-based therapeutics in cancer: antibody-drug conjugates bispecific antibodies across hematologic malignancies and solid tumors.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Engineering CAR-T cells for solid tumors: overcoming antigenic, trafficking, and microenvironmental barriers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment outcomes for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved considerably, with overall survival rates in high-income countries now exceeding 90% as a result of the introduction of risk-adapted chemotherapy and improved supportive care. Further improvement in the outcome of ALL requires new approaches, such as immunotherapy. Blinatumomab, a bispecific antibody to CD3 and CD19, is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in the consolidation phase of multi-agent chemotherapy for B-ALL in adults and children (aged ≥1 month). Randomized studies in pediatric patients with B-ALL in the relapsed/refractory and frontline settings have shown that blinatumomab, when added to chemotherapy or used to replace intensive chemotherapy, results in better outcomes and fewer adverse effects than are observed with conventional chemotherapy alone. Resistance to blinatumomab is associated with high ALL burden, CD19 loss/downregulation, and T-cell dysfunction, and its efficacy against extramedullary disease, especially in the central nervous system, is limited. In addition, the serum half-life of blinatumomab is short, necessitating continuous intravenous infusion, and it can cause distinct adverse effects such as cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Therefore, medical staff require training in administering blinatumomab and monitoring its adverse effects. The development of subcutaneous administration of blinatumomab will make its delivery easier. Whether it is feasible to reduce or eliminate conventional chemotherapy by combining blinatumomab, other forms of immunotherapy, and molecular targeting therapy to improve outcomes while reducing adverse effects requires further evaluation in the frontline setting. Furthermore, longitudinal monitoring is necessary to evaluate the as-yet-unknown long-term adverse effects. Lastly, the experience obtained with blinatumomab in high-income countries should be expanded to low-/middle-income countries, where most of the global population reside and where the outcomes of ALL are suboptimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42045557What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.