Observational studyNeurosurgical review2026
Synthetic polyurethane foam for sphenoid packing after endonasal skull base surgery: propensity-matched trends in cerebrospinal fluid leakage and sphenoid mucosal changes.
Observational study in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and sphenoid sinusitis remain major concerns after endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) for midline skull base tumors. To our knowledge, this study is among the first to directly compare synthetic polyurethane foam (SPF) with balloon catheters (BCs) for sphenoid sinus packing, assessing efficacy and safety, including in high‑flow CSF leaks.
methodsThis retrospective, single-center, observational study included 116 patients who underwent EEAs between April 2016 and March 2025. Since May 2021, SPF has replaced BCs for sphenoid sinus packing. Propensity score matching (PSM) generated 43 matched pairs based on age, body mass index, and intraoperative CSF leak grade (Esposito classification). Outcomes were postoperative CSF leakage and magnetic resonance imaging-detected sphenoid mucosal changes.
resultsAmong 116 patients (median age, 50 years), 57 received SPF and 59 BCs. Postoperative CSF rhinorrhea occurred in 10 patients (8.6% overall), including 3.5% in the SPF group. All three reclosures occurred in the BC group. Post-matching, baseline variables were well balanced. Postoperative CSF leakage did not differ significantly between SPF and BCs (odds ratio [OR] 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.049–1.14 pre-PSM; OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.049–1.29 post-PSM). Postoperative radiologic sphenoid mucosal changes were significantly less frequent with SPF both before and after PSM (ORs 0.13 and 0.14; P < 0.001). Two SPF-group leaks resolved with conservative spinal drainage.
conclusionSPF achieved CSF leak rates comparable to BCs and consistent with recent reports (3.4–6.1%), along with fewer postoperative sphenoid mucosal changes on MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42045550What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.