ReviewBritish journal of cancer2026
Advances in cancer immunotherapy: adoptive cell therapy and immune cell engagers in solid tumours.
Review in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global research trends on the gut microbiota and immunotherapy for colorectal cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adoptive cell therapies (ACT) and immune cell engagers (ICE) redirect or potentiate immune effector function against immune-tolerated antigens expressed on malignant cells, representing a distinct class of engineered immunotherapies beyond immune checkpoint blockade. These strategies have been particularly successful in hematologic malignancies; however, translation to solid tumours has been constrained by antigen heterogeneity, limited immune cell trafficking and persistence, an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment, and on-target off-tumour toxicity. Despite these barriers, accumulating data and clinical experience with these therapies in solid tumours demonstrate feasibility, scalability, safety, and meaningful clinical activity. In light of recent regulatory approvals of ACT and ICE in solid tumours, we aim to provide a comprehensive clinician-oriented overview of these evolving therapeutic platforms. Herein, we review principles of antigen selection, mechanisms underlying investigational ACT and ICE, current barriers to clinical translation in solid tumours, strategies to overcome these limitations, and future prospects for immune-redirecting drug development in solid tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.