Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42045534›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Deep learning-based citrus plant disease classification using a computationally efficient CNN model.

Punam Goyal, Jasmeen Gill, Rakesh Goyal, Manish Sharma, Kanhaiya Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Punam GoyalDepartment of Computer Science, University College Miranpur, Patiala, Punjab, India.
Jasmeen GillDepartment of Computer Science, RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India.
Rakesh GoyalChitkara University Institute of Engineering & Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Manish SharmaDepartment of Electrical, Electronics and Communication Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 203201, India.
Kanhaiya SharmaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Constituent of Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India. Kanhaiya.sharma@sitpune.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in domain-specific classification methods have demonstrated the remarkable performance of deep learning in comparison to traditional machine learning techniques. This study develops a computationally efficient Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model tailored for citrus plant disease classification, achieving performance comparable to that of the pretrained InceptionV3 model. A custom five-layer CNN model is constructed to classify citrus plant diseases into healthy and diseased categories using images collected from citrus orchards in Northen India. The model has been further validated using images sourced from GitHub and the Kaggle database. The proposed method surpasses classical machine learning approaches in accuracy and computational efficiency, achieving classification accuracies of 92.59%. The training time of the proposed CNN AgriVision-L5 is reduced by 50%, respectively, compared to the InceptionV3 model, demonstrating their computational efficiency. The proposed methodology offers significant advancements in plant disease management and sustainable agriculture, aligning with Sustainable Development Goals like SDG2, SDG9, and SDG12.

Indexed as

CitrusDeep LearningPlant DiseasesClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksNeural Networks, ComputerCNNComputer visionDeep learningInceptionV3

Identifiers

PMID42045534
PMCPMC13284177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.