Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Self-fixating (sutureless) mesh versus sutured polypropylene mesh in open Lichtenstein repair: a participant-blinded randomized trial.
Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOpen Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair has been associated with chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP), which remains a problematic outcome. Self-fixating (sutureless) mesh may lessen the tissue trauma from fixation sutures and improve postoperative pain-related outcomes.
methodsTwo hundred adult male patients scheduled for elective open Lichtenstein repairs for primary inguinal hernia were enrolled in this single-center parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized to either Group A (self-fixating/sutureless mesh, n = 100) or Group B (sutured polypropylene mesh, n = 100) in a 1:1 ratio. Participants were followed for 6 months. “Pain was measured on postoperative day 1 and at 2 weeks, 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months using a 0–100 visual analog scale (VAS). CPIP was assessed at 4 and 6 months. Secondary outcomes included the SF-36 total score, operative time, length of stay, time to return to work, complications, and mesh-related patient-reported numbness and sensation. Between-group comparisons were conducted at each time point with Holm adjustment for multiple comparisons for each outcome.
resultsGroup A had lower VAS pain scores than Group B at all time intervals (Holm-adjusted p < 0.001). For example, mean VAS scores were 16.8 ± 4.1 vs 31.5 ± 8.5 on day 1 (mean difference − 14.7; 95% CI − 16.6 to − 12.8), and at 6 months they were 3.8 ± 0.9 vs 12.6 ± 2.8 (mean difference − 8.8; 95% CI − 9.38 to − 8.22). Rescue analgesics during hospitalization were less in Group A (mean difference − 1.40 doses; 95% CI − 1.65 to − 1.15; p < 0.001). Group A had less CPIP at 4 months (2% vs 20%; RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02 − 0.42; Holm-adjusted p < 0.001) and at 6 months (1% vs 10%; RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 − 0.77; Holm-adjusted p = 0.010). SF-36 scores also improved in both groups, but the Holm-adjusted scores did not remain significant. Group A had shorter operative time (mean difference − 11.2 min; 95% CI − 14.1 to − 8.3; p < 0.001), whereas the remaining outcomes, including length of hospital stay, time to return to work, and postoperative complication rates, were similar between the groups.
conclusionsIn adult males who underwent open Lichtenstein repair, self-fixing (sutureless) mesh was associated with lower postoperative pain and a lower incidence of CPIP at 6 months, shorter operative time, and no increase in early complications. These findings warrant additional research, including longer follow-up and multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42045525What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.