ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of physiology-based models for noninvasive blood pressure estimation using pulse arrival time.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A noninvasive and nonocclusive blood pressure (BP) measurement method is essential for ambulatory and long-term monitoring. It appears that in the case of wearable systems for continuous pressure measurement, the technique utilizing the dependence of pulse wave velocity on pressure is particularly useful. However, it has some limitations, e.g., accuracy. A generalized, nonlinear model, with respect to physiological parameters, for BP estimation, utilizing information about pulse arrival time (PAT), pulse period (RR), and respiratory activity phase (resp), is proposed and analysed. Analyses have been conducted using a publicly available database. The models are compared against each other using various measures such as correlation, root mean square, Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, and minimum description length. An optimal model, superior to those presented in the literature, is recommended for each measure. In addition, the influence of individual signals on the pressure estimation error was analysed. The results show that simple models generate large errors in BP estimation. Including more parameters improves the results, but the errors are still relatively large. The presented results suggest that the considered signals, i.e., PAT, RR, and resp, contain incomplete information about the current pressure value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.