ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2026
Knowledge mapping and bibliometric insights of scientific research on targeted protein degradation in oncology.
Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisruption of cellular proteostasis leads to the accumulation and persistence of pathogenic proteins that drive oncogenesis. Key oncogenic and tumor suppressor proteins are frequently dysregulated in cancer, yet remain challenging to target by conventional small-molecule inhibitors. Targeted protein degradation (TPD), particularly through Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) and molecular glues, has emerged as a transformative strategy that enables catalytic and selective elimination of disease-driving proteins. This study aimed to systematically map the global scientific landscape of TPD research in oncology using bibliometric methods.
methodsA comprehensive bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database covering articles published between January 2000 and December 2025. Bibliometric indicators including publication trends, compound annual growth rate (CAGR), citations, H-index, authorship pattern, and institutional contributions were analyzed. Network visualization of keyword co-occurrence, chronological evolution, and international collaboration were performed using VOSviewer.
resultsA total of 1334 publications were identified, demonstrating exponential growth, particularly after 2018, with a CAGR of 51.9% (2016–2025). The field is highly interdisciplinary, dominated by biochemistry, pharmacology, and chemistry. The dataset exhibited a high H-index (111), reflecting rapid intellectual maturation. Authorship analysis revealed a median of 10 authors per article, underscoring extensive collaboration. China and the United States emerged as dominant contributors, forming central hubs in the global research network. PROTAC technology represented the primary research focus, with strong association to ubiquitin–proteasome mechanisms and oncogenic targets such as BRD4, MYC, androgen receptor, and estrogen receptor. Highly cited articles were predominantly methodological, highlighting foundational advances in degrader design and mechanism. TPD research is rapidly evolving toward clinically driven innovations with emerging focus on advanced delivery systems, lysosome-targeting strategies, next-generation degrader design strategies, and combination therapies to overcome pharmacokinetic and therapeutic limitations.
conclusionTPD research in oncology is undergoing rapid expansion and transitioning from conceptual innovation to translational application. PROTACs dominate the field due to their modularity and catalytic efficiency, although challenges remain, including pharmacokinetic limitations, restricted E3 ligase diversity, and potential resistance mechanisms. Overall, TPD represents a paradigm shift toward event-driven pharmacology with significant potential to transform precision oncology by enabling the therapeutic elimination of previously intractable targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.