ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Diagnostic performance of ultrasound-derived fat fraction for grading hepatic steatosis in patients with chronic liver diseases: a multicenter study.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) using the DAX probe for evaluating hepatic steatosis in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients with liver biopsy. Possible influencing factors such as etiology, stage of necroinflammation, fibrosis, and anthropometric indices were also evaluated. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis prospective multicenter study enrolled CLD patients between October 2024 and June 2025. The diagnostic performance of UDFF was evaluated by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) with liver biopsy as the reference standard. Subgroup analysis was performed in different etiologies, stages of necroinflammation, fibrosis, and anthropometric indices.
resultsAmong the total of 255 patients (mean age, 51.27 years ± 11.24; 148 men), 146 (57.25%) had no steatosis (S0). The AUC of UDFF for detecting hepatic steatosis ≥ S1, ≥ S2, and = S3 were 0.914 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.873-0.946), 0.950 (95% CI: 0.916-0.974), and 0.916 (95% CI: 0.875-0.947), respectively. The optimal cutoff values were: 7% for ≥ S1 (109, 42.75%), 11% for ≥ S2 (79, 30.98%), and 18% for = S3 (39, 15.30%). UDFF also demonstrated AUC > 0.9 for detecting hepatic steatosis ≥ S1 in following subgroups: (1) with necroinflammation (n = 164); (2) with advanced fibrosis (n = 61); (3) with skin-to-capsule distance ≥ 1.9 cm (n = 129); (4) with intercostal distance ≤ 2.5 cm (n = 162); (5) excluding isolated metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (n = 178).
conclusionUDFF measured with the DAX probe excellently detected and graded hepatic steatosis in CLD patients regardless of etiology, stage of necroinflammation, fibrosis, or anthropometric indices. KEY POINTS: Question Can UDFF reliably grade hepatic steatosis in CLD patients, regardless of etiology, necroinflammation, or fibrosis? Findings In this mixed-etiology population of 255 CLD patients, UDFF demonstrated high diagnostic performance for grading steatosis, consistent across diverse etiologies, necroinflammation, and fibrosis stages. Clinical relevance UDFF provides a reliable alternative to liver biopsy for quantifying hepatic steatosis in CLD, enabling accurate diagnosis and timely monitoring without invasive procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42045510What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.