ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptive frequency-domain CFAR for robust spectrum sensing under jamming and administrator-controlled counter-access.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid frequency-domain CFAR detectors for cognitive radio interference resilience and the dual-use security paradox.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive radio networks (CRN) enable secondary users (SUs) to opportunistically access underutilized licensed spectrum while protecting primary users (PUs) from interference. However, robust spectrum sensing under heterogeneous interference and noise uncertainty remains challenging. Conventional energy detection, matched filtering, and cyclostationary approaches either require extensive prior knowledge or degrade under interference, leading to excessive false alarms and service denial. We propose an adaptive frequency-domain constant false alarm rate (CFAR) spectrum sensing approach that dynamically sets frequency-specific thresholds based on neighboring spectral samples. This enhancement requires minimal prior knowledge. To address potential security risks from untrusted SUs exploiting this resilience, we introduce a centralized counter-access mechanism: an administrator-controlled jammer that defeats CFAR-equipped adversaries, preventing unauthorized access during emergencies. It safeguards primary communications by creating strategic frequency gaps that avoid known jammed PU channels. Using APCO Project 25 waveforms for PUs, Monte Carlo simulations evaluate cell-averaging (CA), greatest-of (GO), smallest-of (SO), order-statistics (OS), and censored CFAR variants across different channel models combined with multiple jamming scenarios. Results show OS and censored CFAR variants best stabilize false alarm rates and enhance detection in heterogeneous conditions, outperforming CA and GO/SO schemes. The comb-sweep jammer effectively denies service to CFAR-equipped SUs without impacting PUs, though at the expense of reduced spectrum availability. Sensitivity analysis confirms robustness across varied CFAR window configurations, precluding parameter-based evasion by unauthorized SUs. This work frames spectrum sensing and jamming in CRNs as a two-sided interaction between electronic protection for secondary users and administrative electronic attack for controlled denial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.