ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Early bilingualism as a protective factor against acute post-stroke aphasia.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsAphasia is among the most debilitating post-stroke deficits. Previous studies have suggested that bilingualism, the ability to use more than one language, may confer advantages in language recovery compared with monolingualism in patients with chronic stroke. Our aim was to determine whether early pre-scholar simultaneous bilingualism acts as a protective factor by examining language recovery within the first seven days after acute ischaemic stroke.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical and neuroimaging data from Italian monolingual and early bilingual (Slovenian- and Croatian-Italian) patients with anterior-circulation ischaemic stroke and aphasia who were consecutively admitted between January 2018 and April 2020. The two cohorts were compared, and a multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify variables associated with language improvement at 7 days, defined as a ≥ 1-point reduction or complete recovery.
resultsThe two groups did not differ in demographic or clinical characteristics, type of acute treatment, or extent of the ischaemic lesion. Early bilingual patients exhibited significantly greater improvement in NIHSS language scores at day seven. In multivariate analysis, early bilingualism (p = 0.005) emerged as independent predictor of early language recovery, with consistent effect sizes across sensitivity analyses.
conclusionsEarly bilingualism (eBL) is an independent and robust predictor of aphasia recovery within the first seven days after stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.