ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Role of characteristic impedance in carotid stiffness and cognitive dysfunction: interaction with proximal aortic stiffness.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increased stiffness in the proximal aorta and carotid artery, both crucial for regulating blood pressure and flow pulsatility, may contribute to cerebral microcirculation damage and cognitive decline. While aortic stiffness measured by aortic characteristic impedance (Zc) has been linked to suspected mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the role of carotid stiffness remains unclear due to inconsistent findings using traditional distensibility measures. This study investigates the relationship between carotid characteristic impedance (CCI) and suspected MCI, and examines how CCI interacts with Zc in contributing to cognitive dysfunction. A total of 1423 healthy community residents (average age 59.8 ± 11.7 years; 46.9% male) underwent comprehensive hemodynamic evaluations and carotid ultrasonography. CCI and Zc were calculated in the time domain, and the characteristic impedance ratio (CIR), defined as CCI/Zc, was used to assess the influence of impedance mismatch. Suspected MCI was determined using education-adjusted Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) cut-offs. Among participants, 478 (33.6%) were identified with suspected MCI. These individuals showed significantly higher CCI, while other carotid distensibility parameters were not significantly different. CCI was the only carotid stiffness measure independently associated with suspected MCI (OR per SD: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.02-1.36). CIR was negatively associated with MCI (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73-0.95), suggesting that a mismatch in impedance contributes to cognitive decline. The combination of elevated Zc and CCI was the strongest predictor of suspected MCI (OR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.47-2.98). These findings underscore CCI as a sensitive and valuable marker for assessing carotid stiffness in relation to cognitive dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.