ArticleScientific reports2026
Physics-informed deep learning for molecular solubility prediction: integrating thermodynamic constraints with neural network architectures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of aqueous solubility remains a fundamental challenge in drug discovery and molecular design, with traditional machine learning approaches often producing predictions that violate basic thermodynamic principles. Here, we introduce a physics-informed neural network (PINN) framework that explicitly incorporates thermodynamic constraints into the learning process, ensuring physical consistency while improving predictive accuracy. Our approach decomposes solvation free energy into physically interpretable components—cavity formation, electrostatic interactions, van der Waals forces, and hydrogen bonding—and enforces their thermodynamic relationships through custom loss functions. We augment the standard AqSolDB dataset (9982 molecules) with quantum chemistry calculations for 1,500 molecules, providing ground-truth energy decompositions. The physics-informed model achieves RMSE of 0.36 log units on AqSolDB and demonstrates 35% improved performance on scaffold split extrapolation on extrapolation to novel chemical scaffolds compared to purely data-driven approaches. Critically, 96.3% of predictions satisfy stringent thermodynamic consistency (energy conservation error < 2 kJ/mol), compared to only 67.4% for standard neural networks, with major physics violations reduced from 32.6 to 3.7%. This work establishes a general framework for incorporating domain knowledge into molecular property prediction, with immediate applications in drug design, materials discovery, and chemical engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.