Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42045418›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026

The role of large language models in the diagnosis and management of obstetric patients: a pilot feasibility study using simulated obstetric cases.

Iason Psilopatis, Katharina Redling, Valeria Filippi, Sofia Kappos, Julius Emons, Beatrice Mosimann, Tibor A Zwimpfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iason PsilopatisDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. iason.psilopatis@usb.ch.
Katharina RedlingDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Valeria FilippiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sofia KapposDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Julius EmonsDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Beatrice Mosimann *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Tibor A Zwimpfer *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis feasibility study aimed to assess the potential of freely available large language models (LLMs) to support clinical decision-making in obstetrics.

methodsFive fictional obstetric patient cases, encompassing a range of clinical presentations (preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, preterm premature rupture of membranes, vaginal bleeding, and abdominal trauma), were presented to three LLMs: Chat-GPT (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), and DeepSeek. The LLMs were tasked with evaluating the patient information, suggesting potential diagnoses, and outlining appropriate management strategies. The responses were qualitatively assessed, and subsequently, four expert obstetricians evaluated the LLMs' recommendations using the Global Quality Score (GQS).

resultsThe LLMs demonstrated an ability to process complex obstetric scenarios and generate diagnostic and management considerations that often aligned with established clinical principles. In cases like preeclampsia and preterm premature rupture of membranes, the LLMs accurately identified key issues and proposed relevant management steps. For fetal growth restriction, vaginal bleeding, and abdominal trauma, they outlined appropriate evaluation frameworks and differential diagnoses. The responses varied in their level of detail and directness. DeepSeek received the highest GQS for all five cases in total, whereas Google Gemini was outperformed by the two other LLMs in the cases of vaginal bleeding and abdominal trauma.

conclusionThis preliminary feasibility assessment suggests that freely available LLMs can generate plausible-sounding responses to obstetric vignettes. Further rigorous evaluation using quantitative methods, real-world data, and exploration of integration strategies is warranted to fully understand their role in enhancing clinical decision-making and improving patient care in obstetric practice.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingLarge Language ModelsObstetricsPregnancy ComplicationsFeasibility StudiesFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHumansObstetriciansPilot ProjectsPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPremature Rupture of Fetal MembranesUterine HemorrhageAbdominal traumaArtificial intelligenceFetal growth restrictionLarge language modelObstetricsPreeclampsiaPreterm rupture of membranesVaginal bleeding

Identifiers

PMID42045418
PMCPMC13121220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.