Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42045411›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Retention and caries-preventive outcomes of glass ionomer-based fissure sealants in children: a 24-month split-mouth randomized controlled trial.

Ebru Kucukyilmaz Izgi, Basak Bolukbasi, Fevzi Kavrik, Ilgin Timarci, Selcuk Savas

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07388472 (Retention and Caries-Preventive Outcomes of Glass Ionomer-Based Fissure Sealants in Children), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07388472 nacompletednot on this map

Retention and Caries-Preventive Outcomes of Glass Ionomer-Based Fissure Sealants in Children: A 24-Month Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIzmir Katip Celebi UniversityRan2016 to 2020Enrolled200ConditionsFissure SealantArmsRetention of Fissure Sealants
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ebru Kucukyilmaz IzgiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey. ebrukucukyilmaz@hotmail.com.
Basak BolukbasiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fevzi KavrikPediatric Dentist, Private Practice, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ilgin TimarciDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.
Selcuk SavasDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the 24-month clinical retention performance and caries-preventive efficacy of three glass ionomer–based fissure sealants with different compositions. This randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was conducted with ethical approval and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07388472). A total of 400 sealants were applied to the two fully erupted mandibular first molars of each participant. Following randomization, one molar received GC Fuji Triage (high-fluoride containing/control) (GC Int., Tokyo, Japan), while the contralateral molar received either GC Fuji VII EP (CPP-ACP–containing) (GC Int., Tokyo, Japan) or GCP Glass Seal (nano-fluorohydroxyapatite–containing) (GCP Dental, Vianen, the Netherlands). Patients were evaluated at 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-months. Retention, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, and secondary caries were assessed using modified USPHS criteria. Occlusal caries progression was monitored via ICDAS-II codes and DIAGNOdent measurements. Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests (Friedman, Kruskal–Wallis, with Bonferroni adjustment), and retention survival was assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis (p < 0.05). At 24 months, GC Fuji VII EP and GC Fuji Triage showed significantly higher retention than GCP Glass Seal (p < 0.001). The longest mean survival time was observed for GC Fuji VII EP (20.47 months), followed by GC Fuji Triage (19.53 months). No occlusal caries development or upward transitions in ICDAS-II scores were detected in any group. DIAGNOdent values decreased significantly over time across all materials (p < 0.001). Within the limitations of this study, no evidence of occlusal caries progression was observed over the 24-month period, while retention performance varied according to material composition and physicochemical properties. These findings support the potential of glass ionomer–based sealants to provide sustained caries-preventive effects beyond mechanical retention, possibly mediated by fluoride release and bioactive interactions related to their composition.Clinical Trial Registration The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration number: NCT07388472; Date of registration: 04/02/2026).

Indexed as

Dental CariesGlass Ionomer CementsPit and Fissure SealantsChildDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMolarTreatment OutcomeGlass Ionomer CementsPit and Fissure SealantsCariesFissure sealantGlass ionomerRemineralizationRetention

Identifiers

PMID42045411
PMCPMC13287736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.