ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of breast lesions using a newly developed 3D breast ultrasound imaging device: a preliminary study on efficacy and validity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of a newly developed three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) system, MammouS-N, characterized by mammography-like geometry. In this prospective study of 121 women with 139 breast lesions, MammouS-N images were obtained in three different projections and reviewed in consensus by two breast radiologists blinded to prior imaging and pathology. Image quality was rated for six parameters. Lesion detectability and BI-RADS categories were compared between MammouS-N and hand-held ultrasound (HHUS), and their concordance was assessed using κ statistics. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with pathology as the reference standard. MammouS-N achieved diagnostically acceptable image quality (score ≥ 4) in over 90% of cases and near-complete coverage in 98.6% of breasts. Of 139 lesions, 131 (94.2%) were visualized, including 88 of 92 malignant lesions (95.7%). The area under the ROC curve for malignancy detection was 0.893 for MammouS-N (95% CI, 0.844-0.943) and 0.923 (95% CI, 0.885-0.962) for HHUS, without a significant difference (p = 0.207). BI-RADS concordance between MammouS-N and HHUS showed moderate-to-substantial agreement (Cohen's κ = 0.45; weighted κ = 0.65), with a mild benign-leaning tendency, as downgrades exceeded upgrades (2.1% of benign and 12.0% of malignant lesions were downgraded relative to HHUS. MammouS-N demonstrated high image quality, excellent lesion detectability, and comparable diagnostic concordance with HHUS. Its mammography-aligned geometry facilitates spatial correspondence across modalities, supporting its potential as a complementary imaging tool for breast cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.