ArticleScientific reports2026
Mechanical and microstructural performance of hybrid waste brick powder and glass powder concrete after exposure to 200 °C.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of waste brick powder (WBP) and waste glass powder (WGP) in concrete reduces its environmental impact and improves its performance. In this regard, four concrete mixes with different percentages were made to evaluate their performance individually and synergistically. Fresh properties were measured through the slump test, and hardened properties were assessed through compressive strength, tensile strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, water absorption and density after exposure to 200 °C. Furthermore, microstructure was examined by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The results indicate that WBP reduced workability, attributed to its porous particles. Furthermore, the GP slightly improved in workability and strength. In contrast, the hybrid mix made with 10% WBP and 15%WGP showed a synergistic effect with workability comparable to the control. Also, the hybrid mixes improved splitting-tensile and compressive and strengths by 24.2% and 7.0%, respectively. XRD and FTIR indicated that both WBP and GP participate in pozzolanic reactions, contributing to a denser matrix. The findings also suggest that WBP and GP could support the circular use of construction waste, but further validation is required to support these claims.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.