ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of a high throughput multiparallel stirred bioreactor system using an apple cell line.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cultivating dedifferentiated plant cells in bioreactors offers a continuous, scalable, reproducible, and fully controlled platform for producing valuable secondary metabolites. However, performance is highly dependent on cultivation conditions. In this study, we investigated the impact of different bioreactor configurations on the growth and metabolite production of an apple plant cell suspension culture. Stirred-tank bioreactors (STRs) with different vessel geometries (flat and round-bottom) were evaluated at the multi-liter scale (2-5 L) and compared, for the first time with plant cells, with a high-throughput small volume parallel system (240 mL). Using these mini-bioreactors, we studied the effect of impeller type (Rushton, marine, elephant ear) and pO2 cascade controls on cell growth and triterpene production. Results revealed that triterpene content and biomass yield varied significantly across cultivation systems and that plant cells were highly sensitive to shear stress, with variation coefficient reaching 56.2%-63.5%. Configurations with elephant ear-type impellers seemed to reduce shear stress, supporting stable triterpene accumulation (14.15 mg/g cells DW) and higher biomass (11.8 g DW/L). The high-throughput system closely mirrored multi-liter STR performance, demonstrating consistent and reliable prediction at larger scales. In contrast, wave bioreactors and flask cultures yielded distinct results, emphasizing the importance of continuous monitoring and system-specific optimization. Overall, these findings demonstrate that careful selection of bioreactor design and control strategy is critical for maximizing plant cell growth and metabolite production, and that small-scale high-throughput systems can be effectively used as process development tool for plant cell-based biomanufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.