ArticleScientific reports2026
Artificial intelligence BPNN optimization control strategy in intelligent buildings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the energy management of smart buildings, the building operation environment is complex and variable, and energy consumption signals exhibit characteristics of strong nonlinearity, high temporal dependence, and long cycles. Traditional single models fail to accurately depict their high-dimensional mapping relationships. To improve the accuracy of energy consumption prediction and optimize control strategies, this study proposes an RNN-BPNN hybrid model that combines Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), and constructs a prediction-driven closed-loop system for energy consumption optimization control. RNN is used to extract time-series features, while BPNN is applied for nonlinear mapping and high-dimensional regression, thus achieving collaborative optimization of prediction and control. Experiments are conducted using a public building energy consumption dataset. In scenarios with a well-established energy management system, the hybrid model outperforms single models, with the Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU)-BPNN achieving the best prediction performance: The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) is 311.43 kW, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is 484.29 kW, and the coefficient of determination (R2) is 0.925. Compared with the optimal baseline model, the MAE, RMSE and R2 metrics are improved by approximately 2.21%, 1.90% and 1.17%, respectively. In data-sparse scenarios, the Coupled Input and Forget Gate (CIFG)-BPNN achieves an MAE of 330.33 kW and an R2 of 0.794, demonstrating excellent generalization ability. The results indicate that the RNN-BPNN hybrid structure can effectively integrate temporal dependence and nonlinear features, providing a feasible solution and application potential for energy consumption prediction and optimal control in smart buildings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.