ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of advanced AI models for accurate prediction and uncertainty analysis of aeration inception in hydrofoil-crested stepped spillways.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of the aeration inception point (Li) in hydrofoil-crested stepped spillways (HSSs) is crucial for preventing cavitation damage and ensuring safe energy dissipation and flow regulation. This study aims to develop an advanced machine-learning (ML) framework for reliably estimating Li and quantifying its predictive uncertainty using a unique experimental database. A comprehensive set of laboratory measurements from sixty HSS configurations was compiled and transformed into a dimensionless form based on hydraulic similarity principles. After outlier removal using Isolation Forest and normalization with StandardScaler, the dataset was split into training (75%) and testing (25%) subsets using a fixed random seed. A 5-fold cross-validation scheme was then applied during training to improve model robustness. Five state-of-the-art AI models for tabular data—TabPFN, HistGBoost, M5Prime, AutoInt, and SAINT—were optimized using Multi-Verse Optimizer (MVO) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). Model performance was evaluated using conventional error metrics, Taylor diagrams, and NDGF analysis. SHAP and Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM) were used to interpret the input–output relationships. The results demonstrate excellent predictive skill, with TabPFN-PSO achieving the best generalization on the test set and HistGBoost-MVO exhibiting the most stable behavior under uncertainty analysis. Feature-importance analysis revealed the roughness Froude number as the dominant control on Li. The novelty of this work lies in integrating modern ML models, metaheuristic hyperparameter tuning, and explainable AI within a hydraulically informed framework. This integration enables accurate and interpretable prediction of aeration inception. These findings highlight the strong potential of ML-based modeling as a powerful decision-support tool for the design and optimization of stepped spillways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.