ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluating effects of tissue type, preservation method, and decomposition on DNA quality to support genetic sampling in stranded small cetaceans.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective management decisions rely on accurate insights into species’ population structure, with high-quality genetic material being essential. Stranded cetaceans are an important source of samples, but meeting quality standards remains challenging. Despite their frequent use in conservation genetics, no controlled studies have compared DNA yield and quality across tissue types and preservation methods. This is further compounded by cetaceans uniquely derived physiology, meaning standards obtained from other mammals might not apply. In this study, we compared DNA concentration, purity, and integrity when extracted from skin, muscle, and blubber samples preserved in 96% ethanol or frozen at − 20 °C. Samples were obtained from a tissue bank of stranded dolphins and classified into five decomposition condition categories following international guidelines. All samples underwent standardized protocols for DNA extraction, quantification, and quality control. Statistical analyses evaluated the influence of tissue type and preservation method on DNA quality. Skin consistently produced the highest DNA concentrations and acceptable purity levels, even in advanced decomposition stages. DNA integrity declined with decomposition, except in muscle, which retained higher integrity values in later stages. Both 96% ethanol and freezing at − 20 °C produced good results in early decomposition stages, while freezing was particularly important for maintaining DNA integrity in muscle in more advanced decomposition. Based on these findings, we propose two frameworks: one guiding researchers according to sequencing requirements, and another simplified version for stranding networks. These results contribute to standardized sampling protocols and improve the reliability and comparability of genetic analyses from stranded cetaceans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.