ArticleScientific reports2026
High-density EEG signature of NREM sleep parasomnia episodes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
NREM (non-rapid eye movement sleep) Parasomnia Episodes (PE) such as confusional arousals and sleep-talking represent abnormal wake-like behaviors initiated during sleep, with a known admixture of localized wake-like and sleep-like activities. Using high-density EEG (hdEEG), we quantified whole-scalp topographical EEG differences during PE compared to wakefulness and sleep. Twenty-two adults with NREM sleep parasomnia underwent 256-electrode hdEEG over two nights: a baseline night with ad-libitum sleep and an intervention night with recovery sleep after 25 h sleep deprivation. 79 PE occurred spontaneously or when triggered from NREM sleep during intervention nights. Spectral power of PE, sleep, and wake EEG was compared. Data from 70 PE (in 20 subjects) were of sufficient quality to be compared to sleep (matched for consciousness and sleep stage when possible) and wake. Delta and theta power during PE were significantly higher than wake but significantly reduced compared to sleep in central scalp regions. Additionally, beta/delta ratio values during PE were globally higher than during wake, but globally lower than during sleep. These findings suggest NREM PE feature a unique pattern of mixed cortical arousal and sleep, reflecting abnormal local regulation of sleep–wake boundaries in arousal disorder patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.