Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42045283›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Psychological predictors of noticing and interpreting inequality in daily life.

Jonathan W K Pow, Charlene Y Chen, Kelly A Nault, Andy J Yap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan W K Pow *Organisational Behaviour Area, INSEAD, Singapore, Singapore. jonathan.pow@insead.edu.
Charlene Y Chen *Marketing Division, Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. cyjchen@ntu.edu.sg.
Kelly A NaultIE Business School, Human Resources & Organisational Behaviour Area, IE University, Madrid, Spain.
Andy J YapOrganisational Behaviour Area, INSEAD, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

Ministry of Education - Singapore 020051-00001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite growing interest in socioeconomic inequality, little research has examined how it is perceived in naturalistic, everyday settings. This study employed the Experience Sampling Method to investigate individuals’ real-time experiences of inequality, operationalized as perceptions of social class differences. Based on 6,150 momentary reports from 301 participants in Asia, we identified individual-level variables associated with these perceptions. Our findings suggest that inequality is not always salient in daily life—people do not constantly notice it, and even when they do, they may not compare themselves to others or view the differences as unfair. Notably, individual differences strongly shape these perceptions: social-comparison orientation was consistently associated with two key outcomes—attending to class differences and engaging in self-comparison. Additionally, participants with stronger power distance beliefs and greater fear-based xenophobia toward migrant workers were more likely to perceive class differences. Those scoring high on social dominance orientation, materialism, and fear-based xenophobia toward expatriates were more inclined to compare themselves to others, while those with greater fear-based xenophobia toward expatriates and stronger egalitarian beliefs (lower social dominance orientation) perceived class differences as less fair. These findings shed light on psychological mechanisms that shape how inequality is experienced and evaluated in daily life.

Indexed as

Socioeconomic FactorsAdultAsiaFemaleHumansMaleSocial ClassSocial DominanceYoung AdultExperience sampling methodFairnessIndividual differencesPerceived inequalitySocial class differencesSocial comparison

Identifiers

PMID42045283
PMCPMC13284326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.