ArticleScientific reports2026
No thermal skin effects at environmental 26 GHz field strengths relevant to 5G deployment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The deployment of 5G millimeter wave technology at 26 GHz raises questions about potential thermal effects on human tissues. Controlled human studies examining millimeter wave thermal responses remain limited. We investigated the effects of acute 26 GHz exposure on skin temperature in healthy volunteers under controlled laboratory conditions. Thirty-one healthy young adults participated in a triple-blind, randomized, crossover study. Participants underwent genuine 26 GHz exposure (2 V/m at head level, 1 V/m at torso level) and sham exposure, each lasting 26 minutes 30 seconds. Skin temperature was continuously monitored using infrared thermography at five anatomical regions (face, bilateral hand dorsum, bilateral infraclavicular areas) across three experimental phases. No statistically significant thermal effects were detected, with no main effect of exposure condition for any skin region (all p > 0.34). No significant exposure-phase interactions were detected for any measurement (all p > 0.09). Progressive decreases in distal skin temperatures (exceeding 1.5°C, p < 0.0001) occurred independently of exposure condition, reflecting normal thermoregulatory adaptation to seated immobility. Distal-proximal gradient analysis showed no significant difference between conditions (right: p = 0.332; left: p = 0.319), and bilateral comparisons revealed no thermal asymmetry (p = 0.269). These findings provide reassuring evidence that acute 26 GHz exposure at environmental field strengths produces no detectable thermal effects in healthy young adults, at levels substantially below ICNIRP reference limits. However, these results should not be interpreted as a direct validation of those guideline threshold values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.