ArticleScientific reports2026
An evolutionary weighted feature influence factor feature selection method for fault detection in the Tennessee Eastman complex chemical process.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the low detection accuracy (< 70%) of existing methods for complex faults (d03, d09, d15) in the Tennessee Eastman process, this paper proposes an evolutionary weighted feature influence factor (WFIF) method. The proposed method addresses the limitation that most existing approaches mainly focus on discriminative power and dimensionality, while paying insufficient attention to the stability of feature subsets in repeated selection. Stability is defined as the algorithm's ability to produce highly consistent subsets across different data partitions. Comparative experiments with six existing feature selection methods show that the evolutionary WFIF method improves the F1-score for the three complex faults from below 73% to over 85%, while raising the average F1-score for all 21 TE process faults to 95.79%. Regarding dimensionality, it reduces the average number of selected features to 9.5% of the original 52 variables. In terms of stability (quantification of the dimension size of feature subset by standard deviation), the standard deviation of the selected dimension size is zero for 20 out of 21 faults, with only fault d12 having a deviation of 1, which is significantly lower than that of other methods. Cross-classifier validation further demonstrates the excellent model generalization capability of the selected feature subsets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.