ArticleScientific reports2026
AI-powered industrial quality assurance system for fancy yarn using computer vision and 3D visualization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the problematic issues in textile production is quality control in fancy yarn because of the complicated structure and aesthetic needs of these goods. This paper presents a novel integrated system that combines artificial intelligence and computer vision algorithms for quality assurance of fancy yarns. The proposed system has been designed, implemented as a laboratory prototype, and experimentally validated under controlled conditions. The implemented prototype demonstrates capabilities for defect detection, thickness measurement, pattern analysis, and 3D visualization using a combination of 2D image processing and laser profilometry data. Under controlled laboratory conditions (22 ± 2 °C, 65 ± 5% RH), the suggested system demonstrates a defect detection accuracy of 94.7% (95%, Confidence Interval (CI) [94.1%, 95.3%]), thickness uniformity precision of 96.2%, and pattern regularity reliability of 92.5% (95% CI [91.2%, 93.8%]). The system operates on the plane yarn images in 8 states that comprise image acquisition, pre-processing, feature extraction, thickness checking, defect detection, pattern checking, quality checking and reporting. In accordance with the outcomes of the experiment, the suggested system demonstrates the accuracy of 94.7% in the defect detection, the precision of 96.2% in the thickness uniformity and the reliability of 92.5% in the pattern regularity. The integration of 3D visualization provides manufacturers with enhanced spatial understanding of yarn properties, enabling proactive quality management and reducing non-conformance to quality standards. The complete MATLAB R2024b implementation, including network architectures, training protocols, and evaluation routines, is provided in Appendix A to ensure reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.