ArticleScientific reports2026
Performance evaluation of eco-friendly water hyacinth fiber-reinforced epoxy composites for lightweight protective helmet shell applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utilization of water hyacinth (WH) (Eichhornia crassipes) fibers as a reinforcing material in epoxy-based matrices has been extensively documented. However, research concerning the implementation of these composites specifically for protective helmet shell development remains relatively scarce. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the performance of eco-friendly water hyacinth fiber-reinforced epoxy composites as a sustainable alternative material for fabricating lightweight protective helmets. The composites were fabricated using epoxy resin via vacuum bagging and subsequently subjected to tensile and impact testing. Furthermore, the best composition was utilized to develop the helmet shell, which underwent performance testing in compliance with the Indonesian National Standard (SNI) 1811:2007. The tensile test results indicated that the composites achieved a maximum ultimate tensile strength of 29 MPa, while the impact test recorded the highest impact strength of 27.6 kJ/m² for the specimen containing 10% water hyacinth powder and 30% water hyacinth fiber (A3). The helmet shell testing results revealed that among all testing parameters, only one criterion did not meet the standard requirements, namely the shock absorption performance at the rear area of the helmet shell. Despite one test condition not fully satisfying the standard criteria for helmet shell materials, the overall findings of this study demonstrate that water hyacinth (WH) natural fiber composites exhibit promising potential as a sustainable alternative material for helmet shell applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.