ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2026
Biomarker identification of triple negative breast cancer subtypes using machine learning.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-activated RuORSC advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Triple Negative Breast Cancer is a clinically aggressive and molecularly heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer that currently lacks effective targeted therapies. Recognising biologically distinct subtypes within this disease is crucial for enhancing diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic approaches. This study introduces a comprehensive analytical framework that integrates unsupervised clustering, differential gene expression analysis, pathway enrichment, and explainable machine learning to delineate robust molecular subtypes of Triple Negative Breast Cancer and their corresponding biological mechanisms. Consensus clustering is used to divide patients into different subgroups by analyzing publicly available gene expression datasets. Pathway enrichment analysis is used to find subtype-specific gene signatures and figure out what they do. To improve interpretability and translational relevance, a model-agnostic explainable artificial intelligence approach is used to measure how much key genes and pathways help with subtype classification. The prognostic significance of the genes is further studied to demonstrate the clinical applicability of the identified biomarkers. The suggested framework works well with many different machine learning models and makes it possible to find biologically meaningful biomarkers linked to therapeutic resistance and the ability to spread cancer. These findings elucidate the molecular heterogeneity of Triple Negative Breast Cancer and endorse the advancement of more accurate and interpretable biomarker-driven clinical strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.