ArticleSignal transduction and targeted therapy2026
Drugging the intrinsically disordered transactivation domain of androgen receptor.
Article in Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- BRD4: From molecular understanding to therapeutics development.Molecular cell · 2026Review
- A Spatiotemporal Atlas of the Androgen Receptor Proximal Interactome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Androgen receptor (AR) is a therapeutic target for prostate cancer. Despite effectively targeting its folded ligand-binding domain (LBD), resistance ultimately develops by mechanisms involving reactivation of AR signaling. These mechanisms include expression of constitutively active AR that lacks LBD and fueled the discovery of inhibitors that bind to AR's N-terminal intrinsically disordered transactivation domain (TAD). AR-TAD inhibitors (ARTADIs) are unique due to the paucity of small molecule inhibitors that bind directly to intrinsically disordered TADs, which have historically been considered undruggable. Leveraging our library of ARTADIs using cultured prostate cancer cells and multiple xenograft models, we reveal that small alterations in the chemical scaffold impact selectivity and potency within the AR-transcriptome; impacting signal transduction pathways involved in protumorigenic mechanisms. Mechanistically, these compounds differentially disrupt interactions between full-length AR or splice-variant AR-V7, and co-regulators, as revealed by rapid immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry of endogenous protein and the proximity ligation assay. Biophysically, several ARTADIs displayed exceptionally strong binding affinities that were better than, or were comparable to the LBD-inhibitor enzalutamide, with dissociation constants in the picomolar to low-nanomolar range as determined by surface plasmon resonance and microscale thermophoresis. MS/MS analysis revealed covalent binding to cysteine 129. In vivo, ARTADIs outperformed enzalutamide against prostate cancer xenografts in the presence of androgens, underscoring the therapeutic potential of targeting alternative AR domains. These findings support the feasibility - but also highlight the complexity - of developing drugs against an intrinsically disordered TAD impacted by multivalent binding interactions that may not occur in a stepwise fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.