Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42045134›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026

Impact of dose allocation between high- and low-kV scans on virtual monoenergetic image quality in developmental dual-energy cone-beam CT for image-guided radiotherapy.

Andrew Keeler, Luke Layman, Ha Nguyen, Jason Luce, Mathias Lehmann, John C Roeske, Hyejoo Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew KeelerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Luke LaymanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Ha NguyenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Jason LuceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Mathias LehmannVarian Imaging Laboratory, Baden, Switzerland.
John C RoeskeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Hyejoo KangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4433-0939

Funding

Markerless Motion Tracking of Lung Tumors Using Dual Energy ImagingR01CA207483 · NCI · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI LEHMANN, MATHIAS, ROESKE, JOHN · 2017 to 2025
$2.2M
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health R01-CA207483NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDual-energy cone-beam CT (DE-CBCT) offers potential as an advanced imaging technique for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) through the production of virtual monoenergetic images (VMI). CBCT-VMI can show enhanced image quality, with improved CNR and reduced nonuniformity artifacts, compared to polychromatic images. However, optimized DE-CBCT protocols are required for clinical application. In particular, the impact of the dose allocation between the two acquisition energies on the resulting VMI image quality remains to be assessed. PURPOSE: This study evaluates the impact of different dose allocation strategies between the low- and high-energy scans on the image quality of DE-CBCT derived VMI.

methodsA series of seven DE-CBCT scans were performed using various dose allocations ranging from 10% Low-energy/90% High-energy (LE/HE) to 70%/30% LE/HE in 10% intervals while maintaining a constant total imaging dose. To assess the impact of the dose allocation strategies, VMI were reconstructed at 40, 60, 80, and 100 keV and evaluated for Hounsfield Unit (HU) accuracy, relative contrast-to-noise ratio (rCNR) enhancement, and HU uniformity compared to a dose-matched clinical CBCT protocol.

resultsDE-CBCT protocols between 20%/80% and 70%/30% LE/HE showed significant improvements over the clinical protocol, with CNR values improving by an average of 18%-32% at 60 keV and non-uniformity artifacts reduced to negligible levels without loss of HU accuracy. Statistical comparison between these DE-CBCT protocols further showed that the specific dose allocation had statistically insignificant impact on the resulting VMI image quality between 20%/80% and 50%/50% LE/HE at any energy. Of the remaining DE protocols, 70%/30% showed a significant decrease in HU accuracy while 10%/90%, 60%/40%, and 70%/30% showed reduced rCNR enhancement at some energies.

conclusionsOverall, a wide range of dose allocations are shown to produce comparably near-optimal VMI quality. This finding supports protocol design flexibility for future clinical DE-CBCT implementations.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingRadiography, Dual-Energy Scanned ProjectionRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulatedcone‐beam CTdual‐energyvirtual monoenergetic

Identifiers

PMID42045134
PMCPMC13120888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.