Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42045045›Full record

ArticleNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University2026

[Visual prior-guided masked image modeling enhances chest X-ray diagnostic efficacy].

Jinger Wang, Yu Zhang

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jinger WangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University//Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Yu ZhangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University//Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China U22A20350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a masked image modeling framework that integrates clinical visual priors to enhance semantic understanding and diagnostic performance on chest X-ray images.

methodsA novel framework VP-MIM was constructed by incorporating clinical visual priors into the MIM process. Eye-tracking data from radiologists were used to distinguish diagnostically relevant from irrelevant regions during the masking phase, enabling a controlled masking strategy. In the reconstruction phase, a pyramid attentive reconstruction module was developed to introduce multi-scale supervision, which was further refined by semantic-aware recalibrated gaze heatmaps to optimize feature learning.

resultsExperiments conducted on the RSNA Pneumonia and ChestXray-14 public datasets showed that under linear evaluation with only 2616 pre-training samples, VP-MIM achieved an AUC of 86.83 on the RSNA Pneumonia single-label classification task and a mean AUC (mAUC) of 72.82 on the ChestXray-14 multi-label classification task. In full fine-tuning experiments, VP-MIM showed strong scalability when the amount of pre-training data increased, reaching an mAUC of 85.49 on ChestXray-14, which verified good scalability and excellent performance of this model in practical diagnostic tasks.

conclusionsVP-MIM alleviates the limitations of semantic loss and insufficient multi-scale modeling in medical imaging MIM to result in improved diagnostic performance of chest X-ray.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiography, ThoracicHumanschest X-raycomputer-aided diagnosishuman visual attentionmasked image modeling

Identifiers

PMID42045045
PMCPMC13120960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.