Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42044988›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy2026

Infection Control Practices for Vascular Access Management in Hemodialysis: Results From a Nationwide Survey of Japanese National University Hospitals.

Aiko Yamada, Makoto Harada, Tadahiko Kikugawa, Takeshi Nakata, Koji Hashimoto, Tsuneo Konta, Yuji Kamijo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aiko YamadaDepartment of Nephrology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Makoto HaradaDepartment of Nephrology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Tadahiko KikugawaDepartment of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Ehime, Japan.
Takeshi NakataJapanese National University Hospitals' Association for Blood Purification Divisions.
Koji HashimotoDepartment of Nephrology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Tsuneo KontaJapanese National University Hospitals' Association for Blood Purification Divisions.
Yuji KamijoDepartment of Nephrology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8077-891X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBloodstream infections due to repeated vascular access (VA) puncture and circuit connections remain major concerns in hemodialysis. Therefore, we examined current practices for glove, disinfectant, and personal protective equipment (PPE) use according to VA type in national university hospitals in Japan.

methodsTwo questionnaire surveys were conducted between 2019 and 2022, with responses obtained from all 42 hospitals.

resultsAll facilities used disposable gloves for cannulation and VA connection. Nonsterile gloves were more frequently used than sterile gloves for arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriovenous graft (AVG), subcutaneously fixed superficial artery, noncuffed catheters, and cuffed catheters. In 2019, nonsterile gloves were reported in 67% of facilities for AVF, 60% for AVG, 71% for subcutaneously fixed superficial arteries, 74% for noncuffed catheters, and 73% for cuffed catheters. In 2022, rates were 81%, 60%, 67%, 64%, and 67%, respectively. Disinfectant selection differed by VA type. In 2019, chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) was most commonly used for AVF, povidone-iodine (PI) for AVG and subcutaneously fixed superficial arteries, and alcohol for both noncuffed and cuffed catheters. In 2022, CHG-alcohol predominated for AVF, while PI remained a common disinfectant for AVG and subcutaneously fixed superficial arteries. PPE use increased from the first to the second survey.

conclusionsInfection control practices during VA cannulation and connection varied even among national university hospitals. Further studies evaluating associations with infection outcomes are needed.

Indexed as

Catheter-Related InfectionsInfection ControlRenal DialysisVascular Access DevicesDisinfectantsGloves, ProtectiveGloves, SurgicalHospitals, UniversityHumansJapanPersonal Protective EquipmentSurveys and QuestionnairesDisinfectantsdisinfectantglovehemodialysispersonal protective equipmentvascular access

Identifiers

PMID42044988
PMCPMC13326964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.