ArticleYonsei medical journal2026
Deep Learning-Based Prediction System for Surgical Difficulty in Rectal Cancer Patients Using MRI Pelvimetry.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study presents a system that automatically predicts the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pelvimetry and the clinical characteristics of the patients with rectal cancer, using deep learning (DL) technology and statistical analysis. MATERIALS AND
methodsColorectal MRI data were collected from patients with rectal cancer and input into to the segmentation model for DL training, followed by automatic measurement of pelvimetry parameters from the segmentation results. The measured parameters and preoperative clinical data of the patients were statistically analyzed to identify clinically correlated predictors of surgical difficulty. Finally, using the selected predictors, a logistic nomogram was generated for the prediction of surgical difficulty.
resultsThe segmentation models yielded Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 92.7%-95.7%, and the automatic measurement results exhibited high correlation with the manual measurement results. The identified predictors were age, tumor location from the anal verge, interspinous distance, angle Δ, and mesorectal fat area. The C-index of the generated nomogram was 0.852.
conclusionThe system provides standard guidance for the examination of the difficulty of TME that could potentially be used in clinical settings. A follow-up study could develop this idea to fully automate the entire process with a simple user interface to provide objective predictions and explanations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.