Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42044960›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Prophylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients unfit for cholecystectomy after an acute biliary pancreatitis episode (PROSECCO): study protocol for an open-label, two-armed, randomised controlled trial.

Edina Tari, Áron Vincze, László Czakó, Vasile Sandru, Stig Borbjerg Laursen, Sergio Cadoni, Matteo Brunacci, Márton Kiss, Péter Hegyi, Bálint Erőss

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07238296 (Prophylactic Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in Patients Unfit for Cholecystectomy After an Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Episode - an Open-label, Two-armed, Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07238296 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Prophylactic Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in Patients Unfit for Cholecystectomy After an Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Episode - an Open-label, Two-armed, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSemmelweis UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled92ConditionsAcute Biliary PancreatitisArmsProphylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Edina TariCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Áron VinczeInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
László CzakóCenter of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6331-0802
Vasile SandruSpitalul Clinic de Urgență București, Bucharest, Romania.
Stig Borbjerg LaursenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Sergio CadoniDigestive Endoscopy Unit, CTO Hospital, Iglesias, Italy.
Matteo BrunacciOspedale Civile Sant'Andrea, La Spezia, Italy.
Márton KissCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter HegyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Bálint ErőssCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary dr.eross.balint@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute pancreatitis is a major cause of gastrointestinal admissions, with an overall mortality of approximately 3%, and 30-55% of cases are biliary in origin. After acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP), elderly or frail patients who are unfit for cholecystectomy remain at high risk of recurrent biliary events and related complications. However, the efficacy of prophylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in this patient population remains unclear. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate whether performing prophylactic ES after ABP can reduce mortality and readmissions for biliary events in patients unfit for cholecystectomy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective, multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial will be conducted in Hungary, with planned international expansion, to assess the efficacy of prophylactic ES in patients with ABP unfit for cholecystectomy. 92 patients will be randomised 1:1 to prophylactic ES or conservative treatment. An interim analysis will be conducted after 65% of the planned enrolment or once 60 patients have completed 12 month follow-up or have experienced a primary outcome event, whichever occurs first. ES will be performed in accordance with current guidelines. Eligible participants are adults with a high probability of biliary aetiology but without a current indication for urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The primary endpoint is time from randomisation to first recurrent pancreatobiliary event within 12 months, including recurrent ABP, cholangitis, choledocholithiasis requiring ERCP or pyogenic liver abscess. Secondary endpoints are pancreatobiliary-related and all-cause mortality, as well as events requiring intensive care. Follow-up visits will take place at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-discharge. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was approved by the Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Medical Council (NNGYK/34436-6/2025). The findings will be disseminated through presentation at scientific meetings and publication in a highly recognised, peer-reviewed international journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07238296.

Indexed as

PancreatitisSphincterotomy, EndoscopicAcute DiseaseAdultCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholecystectomyFemaleHumansHungaryMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEndoscopyHepatobiliary diseasePancreatic disease

Identifiers

PMID42044960
PMCPMC13141007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.