ArticleJournal of educational evaluation for health professions2026
Personality type profiles of medical students and their differences by gender, age, and academic level in Korea: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medical students admitted solely by grade point average show a narrow but highly prosocial personality profile.BMC medical education · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUnderstanding the psychological characteristics of contemporary medical students is essential for effective educational design and learner support. This study aimed to identify medical students' personality types using a geometric personality assessment tool (GEOPIA), determine whether differences exist by gender, age, or academic level, and explore the practical utility of such profiling for supporting educational practices in medical school settings.
methodsThe 40-item Korean Geometric Psychological Assessment (GEOPIA) was administered to 1,173 students across 5 Korean medical schools. GEOPIA classifies individuals into 4 primary types-Round (sociable, relationship-oriented), Triangle (task-oriented, challenging), Box (prudent, stability-seeking), and Curve (creative, sensitive). Frequency analyses and χ2 tests were conducted. Of the 1,016 respondents (response rate, 86.61%), 981 were included in the final analysis.
resultsThe most common primary type was Round (40.3%), followed by Box (31.7%), Triangle (15.2%), and Curve (12.8%). Across the 12 combined profiles, Round-Box (21.9%) was the most prevalent, followed by Box-Round (19.0%) and Round-Triangle (9.7%). No significant differences were observed by gender (χ2=6.360, P=0.095, Cramer's V=0.082), age (χ2=8.314, P=0.091, Cramer's V=0.065), or academic level (χ2=18.044, P=0.260, Cramer's V=0.078).
conclusionGEOPIA may provide a practical tool for identifying learner characteristics and supporting educational decision-making in medical school settings. In instructional design, personality-type data can inform group formation, activity planning, and assignment structure. In student support, the tool offers instructors and advisors a quick way to understand learners' characteristics, which may help guide individualized counseling and promote effective learning experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.