ReviewClinical and molecular hepatology2026
Predictive modeling and clinical decision tools for risk stratification in steatotic liver disease.
Review in Clinical and molecular hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Steatotic liver disease spectrum: From MASLD to MetALD and beyond - Clinical outcomes and precision medicine frontiers.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a leading cause of hepatic decompensation and liver-related death, but most patients with MASLD do not develop these liver-related complications. Risk prediction and care pathways are crucial to identify which patients with MASLD are highest risk and link them to appropriate care. Risk prediction is usually done with blood-based algorithms such as Fibrosis-4, AST-platelet ratio index, and more recent scores such as steatosis-associated fibrosis estimator and LiverRisk Score. Second-line tests include enhanced liver fibrosis and imaging-based tests such as vibration-controlled transient elastography, shear wave elastography, or magnetic resonance elastography. We propose a consensus risk stratification care pathway that can be adapted for different clinical settings. We also discuss key needs to improve upon the state of the art: improving diagnosis/prognostic accuracy, especially of blood-based models, optimizing calibration, and ensuring interpretability of predictive models. Finally, we discuss recent advances in clinical decision support systems including best practice advisories, dashboards, and dynamic guidelines. We highlight factors critical to clinical decision support systems, including integration with existing systems and clinician workflows, minimizing additional burden to clinicians, provision of decision support and recommendations at the time/place of decision-making, and continuous evaluation and local user involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.