Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42044873›Full record

ArticleEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports2026

Non-functioning adrenocortical carcinoma presenting as acute spontaneous retroperitoneal haemorrhage.

Christopher Chan, Renee C F Chan, Mawson Wang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher ChanThe University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6416-7498
Renee C F ChanThe University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia.
Mawson WangThe University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1637-5117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: Adrenocortical carcinomas (ACCs) are a very rare entity with an incidence of approximately 0.5-2 cases per million per year. They are often difficult to diagnose clinically, attributing to non-specific signs and symptoms, especially with non-functioning tumours, with histopathology required for confirmatory diagnosis. Atraumatic adrenal haemorrhage has been described in the literature as a rare presentation of ACC. We describe a case of a gentleman in his fifties presenting with acute spontaneous unilateral adrenal haemorrhage on a background of a pre-existing known incidental adrenal nodule that was lost to follow-up. The patient underwent angio-embolisation and subsequent laparoscopic adrenalectomy, with histopathology demonstrating ACC. This report aims to highlight adrenal haemorrhage as a presenting feature of ACC and stress the importance of close follow-up and thorough initial investigation of adrenal nodules to ascertain their underlying aetiology and ultimately prevent delay in appropriate management. Learning points: Follow-up is essential for adrenal nodules with unclear aetiology to ensure timely investigation and risk stratification, preventing potential harm from delayed management of non-benign conditions. Spontaneous adrenal haemorrhage is a rare but potential presentation of ACC. There needs to be a high index of suspicion for malignancy with atypical presentations of adrenal nodules. Adjuvant mitotane may not improve recurrence and overall survival in low-risk patients, but may be indicated in patients at a higher risk of recurrence.

Indexed as

adrenalendocrine cancersrare diseases/syndromes

Identifiers

PMID42044873
PMCPMC13130872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.