ArticleCancer research communications2026
Natural Autoantibodies Negatively Correlate with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence in Cirrhosis.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer death, and existing HCC risk stratification models in cirrhosis poorly identify patients at the highest risk. We evaluated whether baseline antinuclear antibody (ANA) status is independently associated with incident HCC and whether adding ANA improves risk prediction. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort of adults (age ≥18 years) with established cirrhosis and clinically obtained ANA testing within 12 months of cirrhosis diagnosis. Follow-up began at the cirrhosis index date; the primary outcome was incident HCC. Associations were assessed using cause-specific Cox models with prespecified clinical covariates. We compared discrimination for a clinical model with and without ANA and performed inverse-probability-weighted and immunologic (IgG/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) sensitivity analyses in complete cases. Among 1,023 participants [mean age 53.7 years (SD 10.9); 57% male], 102 developed incident HCC over a median 4.7 years of follow-up. HCC incidence was lower in ANA-positive versus ANA-negative patients (1.10 vs. 3.73 per 100 person-years; log-rank P < 0.001). ANA positivity was associated with lower HCC risk in multivariable models (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.52). Adding ANA improved discrimination (C-index 0.727-0.750) and model fit (likelihood-ratio P < 0.001). Findings were consistent in weighted and laboratory-complete sensitivity analyses. In cirrhosis, baseline ANA positivity is independently associated with lower incident HCC risk and provides incremental prognostic information beyond routine clinical factors. Prospective validation and mechanistic studies are warranted. SIGNIFICANCE: Natural autoantibodies (ANA) are routinely measured, inexpensive, and widely accessible, yet their prognostic value in cirrhosis is not used for HCC risk stratification. In this retrospective cohort, baseline ANA positivity was independently associated with lower incident HCC risk and improved model discrimination beyond clinical factors. These findings support repurposing a common clinical test to refine individualized surveillance intensity and motivate prospective validation and mechanistic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.