ArticleNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation2026
Real-World Multicenter Cohort Study of Inebilizumab vs Low-Dose Rituximab in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders.
Article in Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesInebilizumab and rituximab (RTX) are anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 B cell-depleting antibodies, respectively. They are both used in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). However, limited data on both drugs exist regarding real-world clinical applications. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of inebilizumab vs low-dose RTX in NMOSD patients through a retrospective-prospective multicenter analysis.
methodsThis study collected data on aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G seropositive NMOSD patients from 6 cities in China among those receiving either inebilizumab or low-dose RTX (500 mg), with a 1-year follow-up. Analyses assessed outcomes using inverse probability of treatment weighting and doubly robust models.
resultsWe included a total of 229 patients, comprising 119 treated with inebilizumab and 110 with low-dose RTX. The cohort was predominantly female (217/229, 94.76%). The median follow-up duration was 12.0 months (range: 4.0-12.0) in the inebilizumab group and 12.0 months (range: 7.0-12.0) in the low-dose RTX group. Relapses occurred in 8/119 (6.72%) inebilizumab recipients vs 24/110 (21.82%) low-dose RTX recipients (hazard ratio [HR] 3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.56-9.14; DISCUSSION: In this short-term study, inebilizumab demonstrated greater efficacy in reducing relapse risk, along with significantly lower rates of key adverse events, compared with low-dose RTX in patients with NMOSD. These findings support the use of inebilizumab as an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option in a broader NMOSD population. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This short-term study with a 12-month observation period provides Class III evidence that in patients with NMOSD, inebilizumab is more effective than low-dose RTX in reducing relapses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.